Top Iran Official Says Response Will Be “Against Military Sites” as Trump Threatens Strikes - Slate

Top Iran Official Says Response Will Be “Against Military Sites” as Trump Threatens Strikes - Slate

21.32
Top Iran Official Says Response Will Be “Against Military Sites” as Trump Threatens Strikes - Slate

Iranians take part in an anti-U.S. rally to protest the killings during a U.S. airstike of Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani (picture) and Iraqi paramilitary chief Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, in the capital Tehran on January 4, 2020.

Iranians take part in an anti-U.S. rally to protest the killings during a U.S. airstike of Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani (picture) and Iraqi paramilitary chief Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, in the capital Tehran on January 4, 2020.

ATTA KENARE/Getty Images

Iran’s response to the killing of top Iranian general Maj. Gen. Qassim Soleimani will be “against military sites,” Hossein Dehghan, the military adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, told CNN. Dehghan, a former defense minister, appeared to be trying to play down the threat of all-out conflict, saying that the country’s “leadership has officially announced that we have never been seeking war and we will not be seeking war.” Yet Dehgan also warned against further retaliations from the United States, implying that could launch a new round of violence.

“It was America that has started the war. Therefore, they should accept appropriate reactions to their actions,” he said. “The only thing that can end this period of war is for the Americans to receive a blow that is equal to the blow they have inflicted. Afterward they should not seek a new cycle.”

Iran's then-Defense Minister Hossein Dehghan gives a speech at the 6th Moscow Conference on International Security (MCIS) in Moscow on April 26, 2017.

Iran’s then-Defense Minister Hossein Dehghan gives a speech at the 6th Moscow Conference on International Security (MCIS) in Moscow on April 26, 2017.

NATALIA KOLESNIKOVA/Getty Images

Dehghan spoke shortly after President Donald Trump warned that his administration had identified “52 Iranian sites” that will be targeted if Tehran decides to launch an attack to retaliate against the killing of Soleimani. “Let this serve as a WARNING that if Iran strikes any Americans, or American assets, we have targeted 52 Iranian sites (representing the 52 American hostages taken by Iran many years ago), some at a very high level & important to Iran & the Iranian culture,” Trump wrote. The president did not identify the targets but said they would be “HIT VERY FAST AND VERY HARD.”

Dehghan characterized the tweets as “ridiculous and absurd,” calling Trump a “veritable gangster and a gambler,” adding that “he is no politician, he has no mental stability.” If Trump does strike any Iran cultural sites, “for sure no American military staff, no American political center, no American military base, no American vessel will be safe,” he added. Responding to Trump’s tweets, Information and Telecommunications Minister Mohammad Javad Azari-Jahromi wrote that “Trump is a ‘terrorist in a suit’.” Iran summoned the Swiss envoy that represents U.S. interests in Tehran on Sunday to protest “Trump’s hostile remarks,” Iranian state television reported.

Shortly before Trump sent out his threatening tweets, the White House formally notified Congress under the War Powers Act of the operation that killed Soleimani. The notification is required to be issued within 48 hours of U.S. forces being introduced into an armed conflict or any event that could lead to war. The document that was sent late Saturday only had classified information that is expected to detail the justification for the assassination. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said that the notification “raises more questions than it answers.” The document Pelosi added, “prompts serious and urgent questions about the timing, manner and justification of the Administration’s decision to engage in hostilities against Iran.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)



2020-01-05 13:41:00Z
https://ift.tt/2N0legG
CAIiEFTe4_4jaaYRdshuXGewPj8qFQgEKg0IACoGCAowuLUIMNFnMLnhAg
Top Iran Official Says Response Will Be “Against Military Sites” as Trump Threatens Strikes - Slate

Top Iran Official Says Response Will Be “Against Military Sites” as Trump Threatens Strikes - Slate

21.32
Top Iran Official Says Response Will Be “Against Military Sites” as Trump Threatens Strikes - Slate

Iranians take part in an anti-U.S. rally to protest the killings during a U.S. airstike of Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani (picture) and Iraqi paramilitary chief Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, in the capital Tehran on January 4, 2020.

Iranians take part in an anti-U.S. rally to protest the killings during a U.S. airstike of Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani (picture) and Iraqi paramilitary chief Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, in the capital Tehran on January 4, 2020.

ATTA KENARE/Getty Images

Iran’s response to the killing of top Iranian general Maj. Gen. Qassim Soleimani will be “against military sites,” Hossein Dehghan, the military adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, told CNN. Dehghan, a former defense minister, appeared to be trying to play down the threat of all-out conflict, saying that the country’s “leadership has officially announced that we have never been seeking war and we will not be seeking war.” Yet Dehgan also warned against further retaliations from the United States, implying that could launch a new round of violence.

“It was America that has started the war. Therefore, they should accept appropriate reactions to their actions,” he said. “The only thing that can end this period of war is for the Americans to receive a blow that is equal to the blow they have inflicted. Afterward they should not seek a new cycle.”

Iran's then-Defense Minister Hossein Dehghan gives a speech at the 6th Moscow Conference on International Security (MCIS) in Moscow on April 26, 2017.

Iran’s then-Defense Minister Hossein Dehghan gives a speech at the 6th Moscow Conference on International Security (MCIS) in Moscow on April 26, 2017.

NATALIA KOLESNIKOVA/Getty Images

Dehghan spoke shortly after President Donald Trump warned that his administration had identified “52 Iranian sites” that will be targeted if Tehran decides to launch an attack to retaliate against the killing of Soleimani. “Let this serve as a WARNING that if Iran strikes any Americans, or American assets, we have targeted 52 Iranian sites (representing the 52 American hostages taken by Iran many years ago), some at a very high level & important to Iran & the Iranian culture,” Trump wrote. The president did not identify the targets but said they would be “HIT VERY FAST AND VERY HARD.”

Dehghan characterized the tweets as “ridiculous and absurd,” calling Trump a “veritable gangster and a gambler,” adding that “he is no politician, he has no mental stability.” If Trump does strike any Iran cultural sites, “for sure no American military staff, no American political center, no American military base, no American vessel will be safe,” he added. Responding to Trump’s tweets, Information and Telecommunications Minister Mohammad Javad Azari-Jahromi wrote that “Trump is a ‘terrorist in a suit’.” Iran summoned the Swiss envoy that represents U.S. interests in Tehran on Sunday to protest “Trump’s hostile remarks,” Iranian state television reported.

Shortly before Trump sent out his threatening tweets, the White House formally notified Congress under the War Powers Act of the operation that killed Soleimani. The notification is required to be issued within 48 hours of U.S. forces being introduced into an armed conflict or any event that could lead to war. The document that was sent late Saturday only had classified information that is expected to detail the justification for the assassination. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said that the notification “raises more questions than it answers.” The document Pelosi added, “prompts serious and urgent questions about the timing, manner and justification of the Administration’s decision to engage in hostilities against Iran.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)



2020-01-05 13:41:00Z
https://ift.tt/2N0legG
CAIiEFTe4_4jaaYRdshuXGewPj8qFQgEKg0IACoGCAowuLUIMNFnMLnhAg
Top 10 science anniversaries in 2020 - Science News

Top 10 science anniversaries in 2020 - Science News

20.32
Top 10 science anniversaries in 2020 - Science News

2020, the International Year of Good Vision, is also a good year for scientific anniversaries.

As usual, there are the birthday anniversaries, offering an opportunity to recognize some of the great scientists of the past for their contributions to humankind’s collective knowledge. And there are the anniversaries of accomplishments, discoveries or events that left the world a different place than it had been before. There’s even an Einstein anniversary, which there almost always is.

What’s more, by selecting the Top 10 anniversaries carefully, you can illustrate how often key scientific concepts are intertwined — neutrons with bombs, for example, or magnetism with X-rays with DNA. So here, without any deep meaning to the order of presentation, are the Top 10 Science Anniversaries in 2020:

10. Roger Bacon, 800th birthday

Nobody knows for sure exactly when Bacon was born, but a passage in his writings suggests that it was around 1220. He was among the premier natural philosophers of his day; he studied first at Oxford and then lectured at the University of Paris. He became a Franciscan monk but often got in trouble for breaking the order’s rules.

Bacon was among the first to advocate for the importance of experiment in investigating nature. He especially emphasized the status of optics as a fundamental science. Bacon also understood the necessity of applying math when explaining natural phenomena. “The power of mathematics is capable of unfolding the causes of all things, and of giving a sufficient explanation of human and divine phenomena,” he wrote. Bacon thought that many big-name philosophers of his era were dolts, but revered the philosopher-theologian Robert Grosseteste, and developed some of his ideas more fully, including the role of mathematics and the notion that “laws of nature” governed natural phenomena.

9. Bose-Einstein condensate, 25th anniversary

No scientist has made more news after their death than Albert Einstein. From lasers to black holes to gravitational waves, multiple major modern discoveries have merely verified predictions from decades earlier rooted in Einstein’s imagination. One such example came in 1995 when physicists produced a new weird wavy form of matter called a Bose-Einstein condensate. In this case Einstein’s imagination was inspired by the Indian physicist Satyendra Bose.

In 1924 Bose sent Einstein a paper describing (mathematically) light as a gas of particles (what we now call photons). Around that time Einstein read a paper by Louis de Broglie contending that matter particles (such as electrons) could be construed as waves. Einstein mashed up de Broglie with Bose and ended up describing matter with Bose’s math. Einstein envisioned wavy “boson” atoms that would merge into a kind of cloud of unified matter.

Making such a Bose-Einstein condensate cloud requires special conditions (it must be extremely cold, for one thing), and it took seven decades before physicists overcame the technical challenges and proved Einstein right, once again.

8. The Great Debate, centennial

Forget politics, the greatest debate of the 20th century took place on April 26, 1920, when astronomers Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis faced off at the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C. Or at least that is the standard scientific lore.

Actually, the debate was pretty boring. Shapley read a paper about the current understanding of the Milky Way galaxy, which he believed to constitute the whole universe. Curtis read a paper contending that spiral-shaped nebulae visible through telescopes were in fact distant island universes comparable to the Milky Way. The winner of the debate was not announced until 1924, when Edwin Hubble showed that Curtis was right. Shapley conceded and for a while referred to the new cosmos of multiple galaxies as a multiverse.

7. Discovery of electromagnetism, bicentennial

Usually it’s not a good idea to play around with electricity. But two centuries ago, scientists didn’t know very much about it and curiosity got the better of them. Good thing, because that curiosity led to a discovery of unexaggeratable importance for the future of civilization.

A first step was Alessandro Volta’s primitive battery, invented in 1800. It launched a frenzy of electrical experimentation. Over the next 20 years many researchers investigated possible links between electricity and magnetism. Among them was Hans Christian Oersted at the University of Copenhagen, a chemist-physicist who had originally been trained as a pharmacist. Oersted had long suspected that electricity and magnetism shared a deep unity. During a lecture in the spring of 1820, he noticed that a current caused a nearby compass needle to move.

By July Oersted had conducted (get it?) thorough experiments enabling him to announce the discovery of electromagnetism — the generation of a magnetic emanation outside a wire carrying an electric current. About a decade later Michael Faraday showed the opposite, that moving a magnet around a wire induces an electric current. That established the principle behind electric power generation on large scales.

6. Discovery of X-rays, 125th anniversary

When Wilhelm Röntgen discovered X-rays in 1895, they were almost immediately put to use in medical practice. But they had a scientific significance just as great as their truly revolutionary importance for medicine.

For one thing, they bolstered the relatively recent realization that light was just one of several forms of electromagnetic radiation. (Only a few years earlier Heinrich Hertz had demonstrated the existence of radio waves, verifying James Clerk Maxwell’s suspicion that light was not the only form of electromagnetic waves.) “There seems to exist some kind of relationship between the new rays and light rays; at least this is indicated by the formation of shadows,” Röntgen wrote in his first report of the discovery. Ironically, later experiments on X-rays showed that electromagnetic “waves” sometimes behave as particles.

Eventually, X-rays transformed not only medicine but also astronomy and even biology, as they provided the tool that revealed the architecture of the molecules of life. See item 5.

5. Rosalind Franklin, 100th birthday

Franklin, born in July 25, 1920, in London, showed an early interest in science and trained as a chemist, becoming an expert on coal and other carbon-based materials. She earned a doctorate from the University of Cambridge in 1945. She then worked in Paris, developing skills at using X-ray crystallography to study crystalline structures, before moving to King’s College London, where Maurice Wilkins had been studying the molecular structure of DNA. Franklin took up DNA studies and produced exceptional X-ray images. She came close to determining DNA’s double-helix structure, but didn’t get it quite right.

Meanwhile James Watson, who had been following her research, was shown one of her X-ray images by Wilkins in early 1953, enabling Watson and Francis Crick to deduce the correct DNA architecture. Franklin saw that the Watson-Crick model was consistent with her work, but didn’t immediately accept that the model would ultimately turn out to be right in detail. She died in 1958, and so was not eligible for the Nobel Prize, awarded four years later to Watson and Crick. Wilkins also shared the prize, but there is no doubt that had she still been alive, Franklin would have deserved it more than he did. 

4. John Graunt, 400th birthday

Born on April 24, 1620, in London, Graunt became a successful and influential merchant after taking over his father’s drapery business. Around age 40, for some reason he became interested in the weekly “Bills of Mortality” that enumerated deaths in the city. It occurred to him to also collect records of births and diseases to create tables that showed trends or patterns. He subjected the data to mathematical analyses, revealing insights such as women live (on average) longer than men, and death rates were higher in cities than rural areas.

Graunt’s work earned him election to the Royal Society, but the Great Fire of London in 1666 burned down his house, damaging his business and sending him straight into poverty. Graunt was later recognized as the pioneer of drawing scientific conclusions from the analysis of statistical information; his work is considered a cornerstone in the foundation of the modern sciences of statistics and demography.

3. Florence Nightingale, 200th birthday

Nightingale was born to a British family in Florence, Italy, (coincidence? no) on May 12, 1820. Her family moved back to England while she was still an infant. She is best known as the most famous nurse of the 19th century, the lady with a lamp. But she was also an innovative practitioner of applied statistics; she developed sophisticated statistical analyses to support her views on hygiene and health.

She went to nursing school in Germany, and in 1854 she led a team of nurses to aid wounded British soldiers during the Crimean War. Finding horrifyingly unsanitary conditions, she instituted a cleanliness regimen that reduced the death rate among hospitalized soldiers, and she returned to England to wide acclaim. She had single-handedly elevated the social status of the nursing profession and soon she started her own nursing school. She became an expert in interpreting health statistics, and her methods influenced the development of the science of epidemiology. She presented much of the statistical evidence for the benefits of proper health standards in graphical form, earning her a reputation as a pioneer of data visualization. (Her skill at communicating the statistical evidence was instrumental in getting policy makers to adopt her recommendations.)

Sadly, at age 38, she became mostly bedridden from a debilitating disease she had contracted during her Crimean War work. But she continued working from her home for decades, consulting with governments in various countries on how to best implement sanitation and other health-related policies.

2. Prediction of the neutron, centennial

After Ernest Rutherford discovered the atomic nucleus, in 1911, scientists spent years trying to understand how the nucleus was put together. It clearly required constituents with a positive electric charge. From later experiments Rutherford deduced that the basic nuclear particle carrying positive charge was identical to a hydrogen atom’s nucleus, and he named it the proton. Heavier atoms contained multiple protons.

But the number of protons needed to account for an atom’s mass gave the nucleus more positive electric charge than the negative charge of the atom’s orbiting (nearly massless) electrons. Since atoms are electrically neutral, it seemed that the nucleus must contain some electrons to cancel out the excess positive charge. Rutherford surmised that some of those electrons in the nucleus merged with protons to make a new particle that he later called the neutron. He considered it a new kind of atom, with zero electric charge. “In consequence it should be able to move freely through matter,” he said in a lecture delivered June 3, 1920, making it capable, physicists realized two decades later, of initiating nuclear fission chain reactions.

In 1932, experiments by the British physicist James Chadwick confirmed the existence of the neutron, surprising many physicists who had not believed Rutherford. But one scientist not surprised was the American chemist William Harkins, who had made a similar proposal and was actually first to use the term “neutron” in print, in 1921.

1. Atomic bomb, 75th anniversary

It’s hard to overstate the significance for science, or for all of history, of the atomic bomb, first exploded 75 years ago in July at Alamogordo, N.M. It represents a technological discontinuity comparable to the invention of electromagnetism, gunpowder or (the control of) fire itself. The atomic bomb’s main influence on society has been via its mere existence as a weapon in waiting, potentially ready to initiate Armageddon.

But it also still serves as a symbol of the power of science: Physicists probing the unseeable realm of the innards of atoms harnessed knowledge capable of destruction on a scale previously unimaginable. Applying the same knowledge to benefit society through the production of energy has not lived up to its advanced billing, through a combination of ineptness on the part of its proponents and lack of perspective on the part of its opponents. In any case, the bomb’s reminder of science’s importance to society will never fail to persist in the future, if any.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



2020-01-05 11:00:00Z
https://ift.tt/37yi6Ac
CBMiRWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnNjaWVuY2VuZXdzLm9yZy9hcnRpY2xlL3RvcC0xMC1zY2llbmNlLWFubml2ZXJzYXJpZXMtMjAyMNIBSWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnNjaWVuY2VuZXdzLm9yZy9hcnRpY2xlL3RvcC0xMC1zY2llbmNlLWFubml2ZXJzYXJpZXMtMjAyMC9hbXA
Top 10 science anniversaries in 2020 - Science News

Top 10 science anniversaries in 2020 - Science News

20.32
Top 10 science anniversaries in 2020 - Science News

2020, the International Year of Good Vision, is also a good year for scientific anniversaries.

As usual, there are the birthday anniversaries, offering an opportunity to recognize some of the great scientists of the past for their contributions to humankind’s collective knowledge. And there are the anniversaries of accomplishments, discoveries or events that left the world a different place than it had been before. There’s even an Einstein anniversary, which there almost always is.

What’s more, by selecting the Top 10 anniversaries carefully, you can illustrate how often key scientific concepts are intertwined — neutrons with bombs, for example, or magnetism with X-rays with DNA. So here, without any deep meaning to the order of presentation, are the Top 10 Science Anniversaries in 2020:

10. Roger Bacon, 800th birthday

Nobody knows for sure exactly when Bacon was born, but a passage in his writings suggests that it was around 1220. He was among the premier natural philosophers of his day; he studied first at Oxford and then lectured at the University of Paris. He became a Franciscan monk but often got in trouble for breaking the order’s rules.

Bacon was among the first to advocate for the importance of experiment in investigating nature. He especially emphasized the status of optics as a fundamental science. Bacon also understood the necessity of applying math when explaining natural phenomena. “The power of mathematics is capable of unfolding the causes of all things, and of giving a sufficient explanation of human and divine phenomena,” he wrote. Bacon thought that many big-name philosophers of his era were dolts, but revered the philosopher-theologian Robert Grosseteste, and developed some of his ideas more fully, including the role of mathematics and the notion that “laws of nature” governed natural phenomena.

9. Bose-Einstein condensate, 25th anniversary

No scientist has made more news after their death than Albert Einstein. From lasers to black holes to gravitational waves, multiple major modern discoveries have merely verified predictions from decades earlier rooted in Einstein’s imagination. One such example came in 1995 when physicists produced a new weird wavy form of matter called a Bose-Einstein condensate. In this case Einstein’s imagination was inspired by the Indian physicist Satyendra Bose.

In 1924 Bose sent Einstein a paper describing (mathematically) light as a gas of particles (what we now call photons). Around that time Einstein read a paper by Louis de Broglie contending that matter particles (such as electrons) could be construed as waves. Einstein mashed up de Broglie with Bose and ended up describing matter with Bose’s math. Einstein envisioned wavy “boson” atoms that would merge into a kind of cloud of unified matter.

Making such a Bose-Einstein condensate cloud requires special conditions (it must be extremely cold, for one thing), and it took seven decades before physicists overcame the technical challenges and proved Einstein right, once again.

8. The Great Debate, centennial

Forget politics, the greatest debate of the 20th century took place on April 26, 1920, when astronomers Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis faced off at the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C. Or at least that is the standard scientific lore.

Actually, the debate was pretty boring. Shapley read a paper about the current understanding of the Milky Way galaxy, which he believed to constitute the whole universe. Curtis read a paper contending that spiral-shaped nebulae visible through telescopes were in fact distant island universes comparable to the Milky Way. The winner of the debate was not announced until 1924, when Edwin Hubble showed that Curtis was right. Shapley conceded and for a while referred to the new cosmos of multiple galaxies as a multiverse.

7. Discovery of electromagnetism, bicentennial

Usually it’s not a good idea to play around with electricity. But two centuries ago, scientists didn’t know very much about it and curiosity got the better of them. Good thing, because that curiosity led to a discovery of unexaggeratable importance for the future of civilization.

A first step was Alessandro Volta’s primitive battery, invented in 1800. It launched a frenzy of electrical experimentation. Over the next 20 years many researchers investigated possible links between electricity and magnetism. Among them was Hans Christian Oersted at the University of Copenhagen, a chemist-physicist who had originally been trained as a pharmacist. Oersted had long suspected that electricity and magnetism shared a deep unity. During a lecture in the spring of 1820, he noticed that a current caused a nearby compass needle to move.

By July Oersted had conducted (get it?) thorough experiments enabling him to announce the discovery of electromagnetism — the generation of a magnetic emanation outside a wire carrying an electric current. About a decade later Michael Faraday showed the opposite, that moving a magnet around a wire induces an electric current. That established the principle behind electric power generation on large scales.

6. Discovery of X-rays, 125th anniversary

When Wilhelm Röntgen discovered X-rays in 1895, they were almost immediately put to use in medical practice. But they had a scientific significance just as great as their truly revolutionary importance for medicine.

For one thing, they bolstered the relatively recent realization that light was just one of several forms of electromagnetic radiation. (Only a few years earlier Heinrich Hertz had demonstrated the existence of radio waves, verifying James Clerk Maxwell’s suspicion that light was not the only form of electromagnetic waves.) “There seems to exist some kind of relationship between the new rays and light rays; at least this is indicated by the formation of shadows,” Röntgen wrote in his first report of the discovery. Ironically, later experiments on X-rays showed that electromagnetic “waves” sometimes behave as particles.

Eventually, X-rays transformed not only medicine but also astronomy and even biology, as they provided the tool that revealed the architecture of the molecules of life. See item 5.

5. Rosalind Franklin, 100th birthday

Franklin, born in July 25, 1920, in London, showed an early interest in science and trained as a chemist, becoming an expert on coal and other carbon-based materials. She earned a doctorate from the University of Cambridge in 1945. She then worked in Paris, developing skills at using X-ray crystallography to study crystalline structures, before moving to King’s College London, where Maurice Wilkins had been studying the molecular structure of DNA. Franklin took up DNA studies and produced exceptional X-ray images. She came close to determining DNA’s double-helix structure, but didn’t get it quite right.

Meanwhile James Watson, who had been following her research, was shown one of her X-ray images by Wilkins in early 1953, enabling Watson and Francis Crick to deduce the correct DNA architecture. Franklin saw that the Watson-Crick model was consistent with her work, but didn’t immediately accept that the model would ultimately turn out to be right in detail. She died in 1958, and so was not eligible for the Nobel Prize, awarded four years later to Watson and Crick. Wilkins also shared the prize, but there is no doubt that had she still been alive, Franklin would have deserved it more than he did. 

4. John Graunt, 400th birthday

Born on April 24, 1620, in London, Graunt became a successful and influential merchant after taking over his father’s drapery business. Around age 40, for some reason he became interested in the weekly “Bills of Mortality” that enumerated deaths in the city. It occurred to him to also collect records of births and diseases to create tables that showed trends or patterns. He subjected the data to mathematical analyses, revealing insights such as women live (on average) longer than men, and death rates were higher in cities than rural areas.

Graunt’s work earned him election to the Royal Society, but the Great Fire of London in 1666 burned down his house, damaging his business and sending him straight into poverty. Graunt was later recognized as the pioneer of drawing scientific conclusions from the analysis of statistical information; his work is considered a cornerstone in the foundation of the modern sciences of statistics and demography.

3. Florence Nightingale, 200th birthday

Nightingale was born to a British family in Florence, Italy, (coincidence? no) on May 12, 1820. Her family moved back to England while she was still an infant. She is best known as the most famous nurse of the 19th century, the lady with a lamp. But she was also an innovative practitioner of applied statistics; she developed sophisticated statistical analyses to support her views on hygiene and health.

She went to nursing school in Germany, and in 1854 she led a team of nurses to aid wounded British soldiers during the Crimean War. Finding horrifyingly unsanitary conditions, she instituted a cleanliness regimen that reduced the death rate among hospitalized soldiers, and she returned to England to wide acclaim. She had single-handedly elevated the social status of the nursing profession and soon she started her own nursing school. She became an expert in interpreting health statistics, and her methods influenced the development of the science of epidemiology. She presented much of the statistical evidence for the benefits of proper health standards in graphical form, earning her a reputation as a pioneer of data visualization. (Her skill at communicating the statistical evidence was instrumental in getting policy makers to adopt her recommendations.)

Sadly, at age 38, she became mostly bedridden from a debilitating disease she had contracted during her Crimean War work. But she continued working from her home for decades, consulting with governments in various countries on how to best implement sanitation and other health-related policies.

2. Prediction of the neutron, centennial

After Ernest Rutherford discovered the atomic nucleus, in 1911, scientists spent years trying to understand how the nucleus was put together. It clearly required constituents with a positive electric charge. From later experiments Rutherford deduced that the basic nuclear particle carrying positive charge was identical to a hydrogen atom’s nucleus, and he named it the proton. Heavier atoms contained multiple protons.

But the number of protons needed to account for an atom’s mass gave the nucleus more positive electric charge than the negative charge of the atom’s orbiting (nearly massless) electrons. Since atoms are electrically neutral, it seemed that the nucleus must contain some electrons to cancel out the excess positive charge. Rutherford surmised that some of those electrons in the nucleus merged with protons to make a new particle that he later called the neutron. He considered it a new kind of atom, with zero electric charge. “In consequence it should be able to move freely through matter,” he said in a lecture delivered June 3, 1920, making it capable, physicists realized two decades later, of initiating nuclear fission chain reactions.

In 1932, experiments by the British physicist James Chadwick confirmed the existence of the neutron, surprising many physicists who had not believed Rutherford. But one scientist not surprised was the American chemist William Harkins, who had made a similar proposal and was actually first to use the term “neutron” in print, in 1921.

1. Atomic bomb, 75th anniversary

It’s hard to overstate the significance for science, or for all of history, of the atomic bomb, first exploded 75 years ago in July at Alamogordo, N.M. It represents a technological discontinuity comparable to the invention of electromagnetism, gunpowder or (the control of) fire itself. The atomic bomb’s main influence on society has been via its mere existence as a weapon in waiting, potentially ready to initiate Armageddon.

But it also still serves as a symbol of the power of science: Physicists probing the unseeable realm of the innards of atoms harnessed knowledge capable of destruction on a scale previously unimaginable. Applying the same knowledge to benefit society through the production of energy has not lived up to its advanced billing, through a combination of ineptness on the part of its proponents and lack of perspective on the part of its opponents. In any case, the bomb’s reminder of science’s importance to society will never fail to persist in the future, if any.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



2020-01-05 11:00:00Z
https://ift.tt/37yi6Ac
CBMiRWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnNjaWVuY2VuZXdzLm9yZy9hcnRpY2xlL3RvcC0xMC1zY2llbmNlLWFubml2ZXJzYXJpZXMtMjAyMNIBSWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnNjaWVuY2VuZXdzLm9yZy9hcnRpY2xlL3RvcC0xMC1zY2llbmNlLWFubml2ZXJzYXJpZXMtMjAyMC9hbXA

Ngeprank Istri Berakhir Laporan Polisi, Suami Dijerat Pidana?

19.54
Beritaterheboh.com - Kebohongan Debby Maulana (36) terbongkar. Niatnya ngeprank istri di hari ulang tahun justru membuatnya berurusan dengan polisi. Apakah Debby akan dijerat pidana?

Polsek Singosari yang menerima laporan Yosi Andika (32), istri Debby terkait ketidakpulangan suaminya disertai dugaan sebagai korban penculikan, akan melakukan gelar perkara.

Hasil dari proses itu yang nantinya menjadi landasan untuk menindaklanjuti kasus yang melibatkan warga Desa Candirenggo, Kecamatan Singosari, Kabupaten Malang, itu.

"Soal ada tidaknya jeratan hukum, kami masih melakukan gelar perkara. Nanti ditunggu saja hasilnya," tegas Kanit Reskrim Polsek Singosari Iptu Supriyono kepada detikcom, Minggu (5/1/2020).

Menurut Supriyono, kepolisian harus bertindak profesional. Pelaporan istri Debby telah ditindaklanjuti sesuai tahapan penyelidikan.

Akhirnya kerja keras selama 3 hari tersebut berbuah hasil. Debby kembali pulang dalam kondisi selamat seperti dugaan awal kepolisian saat memulai penyelidikan.

"Kami harus profesional karena yang dilakukan ditujukan kepada istrinya untuk memberikan kejutan di hari ulang tahun. Tapi akhirnya malah viral," tutur Supriyono.

Untuk saat ini, kata Supriyono, belum dapat menyampaikan langkah selanjutnya yang akan dilakukan. Setelah berhasil mengungkap kebohongan Debby yang mengaku sebelumnya telah diculik.

"Kami masih terus melakukan analisa mengenai kasus ini. Tiga hari penyelidikan kita lakukan merupakan wujud profesionalitas Polri dalam merespons laporan masyarakat," lanjut Supriyono.


Pihaknya mengimbau kepada masyarakat terutama netizen, untuk tidak terburu-buru memberikan reaksi saat mendengar atau menerima informasi di media sosial.

"Cek dan ricek perlu dilakukan, daripada menyampaikan asumsi yang belum tentu itu benar," tandas Supriyono.(detik.com)


from Berita Heboh https://ift.tt/2QqxHfO
via IFTTT
Health care, corrections, broadband at top of state legislative agenda - Press Herald

Health care, corrections, broadband at top of state legislative agenda - Press Herald

19.02
Health care, corrections, broadband at top of state legislative agenda - Press Herald

AUGUSTA — The Maine Legislature cranks back into gear when it convenes the second session of the biennium on Wednesday, with a focus on several key issues, including health care, corrections, broadband access and climate change.

Lawmakers are poised to start their work on solid financial ground, with an estimated state budget surplus of close to $120 million based on the last revenue forecast in November.

Some of the Mills administration’s top environmental priorities during the 2020 session are expected to focus on a class of chemicals, known as PFAS. The Arundel farm of Fred Stone, above, sustained PFAS chemical contamination resulting from sludge he had spread on the fields which he was told would help the soils. Staff photo by Gregory Rec

“I think we are going to be absolutely looking at how we can bring people together, start with a clean slate and good conversations about what we invest in,” said House Speaker Sara Gideon, D-Freeport.

Any new spending or taxation would likely come in the form of a supplemental budget bill that would have to be offered first by Democratic Gov. Janet Mills.

Mills, like Gideon, said state government accomplished a lot in 2019 under Democratic leadership, but there was still much work to be done.

“This coming session, I look forward to working with the Legislature to continue to tackle health insurance issues, to support quality early and adult education, to strengthen our economy and expand our workforce, and to protect Maine people from the impacts of climate change,” Mills said in a written statement. “By tackling these issues, Maine can and will continue to make progress for its people and future generations.”

Republican leaders said they would brace against unnecessary spending or adding levels of unsustainable debt, instead focusing on key issues, such as figuring out sustainable ways to pay for state road and bridge repairs without regularly borrowing money to do that work.

“We are not going to borrow our way into a good economy,” Senate Minority Leader Dana Dow, R-Waldoboro, said. He said Republicans would do their best to hold the line on taxes and want to focus on sustainable infrastructure improvements and workforce development but do it in a way that doesn’t pinch the state’s many small businesses.

“House Republicans want to make it clear that Maine’s most pressing needs should come first,” House Minority Leader Kathleen Dillingham, R-Oxford, said in a prepared statement. “Forecasted monies should fund needs, not wants. They should help people that are struggling with real-life needs right now. Maine’s most pressing needs include our roads, nursing homes, direct care workers and people with disabilities on waitlists.”

House Republican members of the Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee warned that $76 million of the budget surplus in the revenue forecast are one-time monies, which may not be available on an ongoing basis.

Like Dow, they also said they want to focus on funding highway construction and repair without borrowing for it and without raising additional taxes, lamenting the state’s current $8 billion, two-year budget, which is 11 percent higher than the state’s previous budget.

“We then borrowed $105 million for transportation,” said Rep. Amy Arata, R-New Gloucester. “We need to set priorities. Any additional spending of existing tax revenues should go toward true priorities that should have been included in the $8 billion budget.”

BONDING BILLS

The budget-writing Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee has January public hearings already scheduled on a half-dozen borrowing or bonding packages worth at least $200 million.

Among the bills are measures that would earmark $65 million for research and development for biomedical and biotechnology work focused on helping families dealing with aging, dementia and Alzheimer’s disease; $20 million for local food processing facilities; $50 million for expanding commercial fishing and aquaculture infrastructure; and $50 million to help research labs expand and add new equipment and facilities.

All of the proposals also require matching funds from other public or private sector sources, and if passed by the Legislature would go to statewide referendum for voter approval.

HEALTH CARE, PRESCRIPTION DRUGS

Democrats have vowed to continue their efforts to reduce health care costs while expanding access.

Hannah Goss of Gray holds 6-month-old Stewart while he receives a pertussis vaccination last March. The Legislature will consider a number of bills this session aimed at addressing health care issues. Staff photo by Ben McCanna

Bills to be considered include proposals to set up a new state-run health insurance exchange program, expand dental care for children on Medicaid, and curb the price of prescription drugs. Other bills look to help small businesses provide health insurance to their employees or provide incentives to those that do.

Senate President Troy Jackson, D-Allagash, said a bill meant to provide health insurance consumers with a state-run health insurance consumer protection advocacy office was also a top priority.

“Information is power,” Jackson said. “And anyone that feels like they can pull the wool over your eyes by just spouting off a bunch of stuff, these individual people who have no idea, these insurance people just tell them no. You know – deny, deny, deny and they can get nine out of 10 people to go away.”

Jackson said Maine health care consumers need an advocate in their corner when they are going up against the corporate health insurance industry.

The bills seek to expand on the accomplishments of 2019, when the Legislature and Mills moved forward with funding for a voter-approved expansion of the state’s Medicaid program, MaineCare, under the federal Affordable Care Act.

That expansion, which was expected to add about 80,000 to the state’s health care benefits program for low-income Mainers, so far has only seen about 40,000 new enrollments, but the number is expected to continue to grow.

CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND CORRECTIONS

A broad range of criminal justice and correctional issues will also be a top focus of the Legislature.

The Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee will hear Wednesday from Department of Corrections Commissioner Randall Liberty, who will brief the panel on department-related issues, including the status of the Downeast Correctional Facility, youth recidivism rates and mental health treatment for incarcerated youth.

A pod at the Somerset County Jail in Madison. Morning Sentinel photo by Michael G. Seamans Michael G. Seamans

The Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee has hearings planned in the weeks ahead on numerous bills. These include revisiting state funding of county jails and an ongoing shortage of forensic bed space for those charged with or convicted of crimes who have mental health and substance use disorders or who have been deemed incompetent to stand trial by a court.

Lawmakers are considering a range of policy shifts to reduce the cost of housing prisoners, including reducing or eliminating bail requirements for lower-risk, nonviolent defendants and improving programs that help those leaving jail or prison reintegrate into society with housing, job training and health care programs.

The state’s system for providing lawyers to those who are charged with crimes but are unable to afford an attorney, the Commission on Indigent Legal Services, is also expected to face additional scrutiny in 2020 in the wake of a report from the nonpartisan Sixth Amendment Center, which found the state’s system, the only one of its kind in the U.S., may be falling short in providing adequate legal services to those accused of crimes here.

The report also drew into question how private attorneys who are certified to defend indigent clients are paid by the state and highlighted a lack of oversight in billing and payment practices by the state and the attorneys.

In December the Legislature’s watchdog Government Oversight Committee ordered its investigative arm, the Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability, to launch an investigation into the recently reformed commission.

EDUCATION BILLS

Lawmakers will also consider a series of education bills, including measures that create incentives for school districts to buy all-electric buses and establish rules limiting how schools can discipline young children.

Kindergarten teacher Melissa Wu walks her students back to class at John F Kennedy Memorial School in Biddeford on Jan. 10, 2019. Bills before the Legislature this session seek to address issues at all levels of education.  Staff photo by Brianna Soukup

Another bill in the hopper would permit retired police officers to be hired as school resource officers.

Other bills will continue a focus on higher education student debt. One measure, offered by Senate Majority Leader Nate Libby, D-Lewiston, would create a student debt forgiveness program for first responders, home health care providers and public school teachers in an effort to retain and attract workers to those fields.

Libby said Democrats remained focused on the quality and affordability of health care, workforce development and the sustainable development of public infrastructure.

BROADBAND ACCESS

Libby also said Democrats intend to redouble their efforts to improve broadband and high-speed internet access for rural Maine, following a 2019 defeat of a bonding proposal that would have earmarked funds for that.

Instead of a bonding package, Libby said Democrats would try to use state surplus funds for broadband expansion, with a requirement for matching investments from the private sector. He said in a meeting of Senate Democrats three weeks ago there was broad support for that approach.

Libby said Democrats had promised Mainers they would expand access to high-speed internet.

“We want to try to make good on that commitment,” he said.

Libby also rebuked Dow, the Senate Republican leader, on state debt, saying the current state budget included funds to cover the debt service on the bonding bills that lawmakers failed to send on to voters in 2019. Republicans withheld their support for bonds, which require a two-thirds vote by lawmakers, except for those related to roads and bridges, which were approved by voters in November.

“It is important people understand we are not talking about new money for bonding,” Libby said. “The money is there, but Republicans are just not interested in getting that money out and into the ground for infrastructure improvement and economic development, so we are going to try a different way.”

PFAS CONTAMINATION

Some of the Mills administration’s top environmental priorities during the 2020 session are expected to focus on a class of chemicals, known as PFAS, that are causing health concerns in Maine and across the country.

Commonly used in nonstick cookware and water-repellent fabrics as well as firefighting foam, some varieties of PFAS have been linked to cancer, thyroid disorders, high cholesterol and other health effects. States such as Maine are scrambling to identify PFAS contamination and regulate the chemicals because federal agencies have been slower to respond.

The Mills administration is preparing a bill to allow the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to order “responsible parties” to clean up PFAS contamination or to pay for the remediation. If enacted, the legislation would give the department the same authority it already has for a host of other contaminants, such as mercury.

But the Mills administration is also expected to introduce additional measures based on the recommendations of a PFAS task force that examined the issue for more than six months.

That group’s recommendations included requiring all community water systems to test for the chemicals, mandating that fire departments notify the DEP whenever they use PFAS-laced firefighting foams, and a bond measure to help the state cover the growing costs of dealing with contamination hot spots.

Comments are not available on this story.

filed under:

Let's block ads! (Why?)



2020-01-05 09:00:00Z
https://ift.tt/36rhFYy
CBMiJmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnByZXNzaGVyYWxkLmNvbS8_cD01MTQ2Nzc00gEA

Nyesek! Sule Posting Video Kenangan Terakhir dengan Lina Sebelum Meninggal

18.54

Beritaterheboh.com - Sule merasa terpukul atas kepergian Lina, mantan istrinya. Terlebih, Lina meninggal cukup tiba-tiba, tanpa menunjukkan gejala penyakit serius.

Masih dalam suasana duka, Sule membagikan momen-momen indahnya bersama Lina, lewat sebuah video yang diunggah di akun YouTube pribadinya, SULE Channel. Video yang diberi judul "Kenangan Terakhir Bersama Mamahnya Anak anak" itu diunggah Minggu (5/1).

Video dibuka dengan momen bahagia Sule dan keluarga dalam sebuah mobil. Sule duduk di kursi penumpang bagian depan, sambil merekam video. Sementara Lina, yang ada di kursi tengah, menyanyikan lagu Kesempurnaan Cinta, milik Rizky Febian, putra sulungnya.

Video kemudian menjadi sendu, saat memperlihatkan momen pemakaman Lina, di Bandung, Jawa Barat, Sabtu (4/1). Terlihat Sule berusaha menenangkan Rizky Febian, yang terus menangis.

Potongan-potongan gambar keceriaan Lina saat masih hidup bersama Sule muncul, bergantian dengan suasana duka di pemakaman. Video diakhiri dengan momen khidmat di tengah tahlilan di rumah duka.(tabloidbintang.com)

 

from Berita Heboh https://ift.tt/2SUYpys
via IFTTT